Stop me if you've heard this one before. Jeffrey Epstein, a prominent financier and billionaire philanthropist, ran a secret child sex trafficking ring for the wealthy elite of the world, selling thousands of children to politicians, world leaders, celebrities, and billionaires around the globe - including Bill Gates, Bill and Hillary Clinton, Prince Andrew, Al Gore, and/or Donald Trump. Epstein ran this illegal child sex ring out of his infamous private island, Little St. James, in the Virgin Islands, and for years he and his accomplice, Ghislaine Maxwell, became rich off of pimping underage girls and boys to wealthy pedophiles from around the world, who would fly to the island on Epstein's private plane nicknamed the "Lolita Express".
Epstein was finally arrested in 2019, but before he could spill the beans on his many powerful clients, he was mysteriously found dead in jail, supposedly by suicide, but most likely murdered by the "Deep State" to keep his elite clients' crimes hidden from the public. But fear not, for Epstein kept a detailed list of the elite pedophiles he sold children to, and once this client list is revealed to the world, all the evil elite child rapists who paid Epstein to rape children will be swept up in mass arrests and brought to justice by military tribunals.
You've probably heard all of this before, figuratively and literally, in some form or another. The Epstein case has taken on a new life in the public eye, captivating millions of people. It seemingly has everything; sex, money, government cover-ups, child abuse, dark conspiracies, elite politicians doing unspeakable things behind closed doors... it all seems like a gripping Hollywood spy thriller in real life.
And yet nearly everything I said in that earlier screed - almost every single detail - is a total lie.
Well, actually, not everything. Jeffrey Epstein was, in fact, a billionaire pedophile who, with the assistance of his associate Ghislaine Maxwell, sexually abused dozens of underage girls for years. And when the law caught up with him, he did, in fact, die in jail before his trial. But the infamous island-based sex ring? The ritual child sexual abuse with the world's elite? The "murder" staged as a suicide? The infamous "client list"? All of that is a lie. None of it is true.
Recently, Attorney General Pam Bondi, the FBI, and the US Department of Justice - after claiming for months to be on the verge of releasing the "Epstein files" - finally confirmed that there was no infamous "client list", and that Epstein's death was indeed a suicide. This conclusion infuriated people on all sides of the political spectrum. Right-wingers and the MAGA faithful - who had been eager for the exposure and mass arrests of their political enemies whom they were convinced were on the "list" - felt betrayed by President Trump, who had campaigned on a repeated (and impossible) promise to release the "Epstein client list" if he was elected. On the other hand, Democrats and leftists crowed that the declaration by the DOJ could only mean one thing: that Trump himself was on the list and one of Epstein's clients.
But there is no client list. There was no child sex ring for elites. There was no murder, no cover-up, and no deep state conspiracy involving Epstein.
In this article, I hope to lay out the facts of what actually occurred with Jeffrey Epstein and deconstruct the conspiratorial narrative that has sprung up around his crimes. The tale of Jeffrey Epstein has been tainted by sensationalism and misinformation, and transformed into a furious public witch hunt that has seen countless innocent people accused of child sexual abuse. It's a symptom of a much larger problem infesting public and political discourse, and in an era where sensationalized misinformation runs rampant, I think it's important to stand up for truth in the face of mass hysteria.
Who was Jeffrey Epstein?
A short backgrounder on the man at the center of the conspiracy theory is in order before we examine the theory itself.
Jeffrey Edward Epstein was born on January 20, 1953, to a Jewish-American family in Brooklyn, New York. An intelligent young man with an aptitude for mathematics, Epstein worked as a math and physics teacher for teenagers at an elite private school in his early 20s; while at this job, Epstein was accused of inappropriate behavior with his female students, many of whom were underage.
In 1976, Epstein became a junior stock trader at Bear Stearns, and five years later he founded his own consulting firm, Intercontinental Assets Group, which assisted clients in recovering funds lost by embezzlement or fraud. He quickly garnered a reputation for being able to successfully recover millions of dollars for his clients at a high success rate, and Epstein rose to prominence in his field.
In 1988, Epstein founded his own financial investment firm, J. Epstein & Co., which dealt only with the most wealthy of clients, usually only managing the assets of investors with over $1 billion. His client list - that is, his list of financial clients - was a closely guarded secret, but through his investment firm Epstein became close with the wealthy and political elite of the world, rubbing shoulders with businessmen like Leslie Wexner, who was the CEO of the fashion company Victoria's Secret.
Wexner took such a liking to Epstein that he made him his right-hand man and ultimately director of the Wexner Foundation. With full power of attorney as head of the foundation, Epstein made a multi-million-dollar fortune from managing their financial affairs. He used his fortune to acquire Little Saint James Island in the US Virgin Islands, where he moved his investment firm in order to avoid income taxes.
Epstein's newfound wealth and status gave him access to the world's elite. He attended elite parties and became friends with prominent businessmen, celebrities, and politicians like Donald Trump, Alan Dershowitz, Adnan Khashoggi, Bill Gates, Bill Clinton, Al Gore, and David Copperfield.
Clearly, this is how Epstein made his money. This is how he made his fortune. Not by sex trafficking children to wealthy "clients". Not by being a "pimp". He made his living - and massive fortune - through investment management involving wealthy clientele - and this is why he was frequently photographed with wealthy and/or famous people throughout his life.
But, even so, Epstein did have a dark side to his life. Beneath his charming exterior and his elite circle, the financier was, in truth, a perverse sexual predator with a fixation on young girls. And it was this secret life that would transform Epstein from a popular financier into one of the most infamous sex criminals in US history.
Epstein's crimes first came to light in 2005, when the parents of a 14-year-old girl contacted the Palm Beach Police Department and reported that Epstein had paid their daughter $300 to strip and give Epstein a nude massage. Florida state law enforcement began a 13-month investigation of Epstein, and in 2006, the state of Florida charged Epstein with procuring a minor for prostitution and sex trafficking of a minor. The FBI also began a separate federal investigation of Epstein for alleged violations of federal sex trafficking statutes.
Before Epstein could go to trial, his lawyer - the prominent Harvard professor and trial attorney Alan Dershowitz - reached a plea agreement with the state of Florida.
Under the terms of the agreement, Epstein would plead guilty to two felony prostitution charges, while the federal investigation of him would be dropped. Epstein was sentenced to 18 months in prison and required to register as a sex offender, but many of his victims were left feeling failed by the system, which had given their abuser a "sweetheart deal".
However, this was not the end of the story. In February, 2019, after a lawsuit brought by Epstein's victims, a federal judge ruled the plea deal illegal, finding that it violated numerous victim's rights laws.
This decision opened the door for the FBI to once again open a federal investigation into Epstein for sex trafficking. In July, 2019, federal authorities concluded their investigation, and charged Jeffrey Epstein with sex trafficking of minors and conspiracy to engage in sex trafficking of minors.
And I think it's here that a lot of misconceptions about what sex trafficking actually is have corrupted the facts surrounding Epstein. Let's take some time to address it.
What did Epstein actually do?
Let's start with explaining what Epstein was actually charged with, because I think a lot of this conspiracy theory stems from a misconception about what sex trafficking actually is. It's not uncommon to hear "sex trafficking" be used in discussions of illegal prostitution of women or girls to clients for money, and yes that is indeed a form of sex trafficking.
But sex trafficking is defined federally as "the recruitment, harboring, transportation, provision, obtaining, patronizing, or soliciting of a person for the purpose of a commercial sex act in which a commercial sex act is induced by force, fraud, or coercion, or in which the person induced to perform such act has not attained 18 years of age".
This definition, as can be seen, is much broader than just selling or buying sex victims for money. Merely transporting victims across state lines for the purpose of sexual exploitation is enough to qualify as sex trafficking under US federal law, and it is this that Epstein was charged with, according to the Department of Justice's own indictment against him in July, 2019. Here are some relevant excerpts from the DOJ allegations:
"From at least 2002 through at least 2005, JEFFREY EPSTEIN enticed and recruited, and caused to be enticed and recruited, dozens of minor girls to visit his mansion in New York, New York (the “New York Residence”), and his estate in Palm Beach, Florida (the “Palm Beach Residence”), to engage in sex acts with him, after which he would give the victims hundreds of dollars in cash.
In order to maintain and increase his supply of victims, EPSTEIN also paid certain victims to recruit additional underage girls whom he could similarly abuse. In this way, EPSTEIN created a vast network of underage victims for him to sexually exploit, often on a daily basis, in locations including New York and Palm Beach."
"In both New York and Florida, EPSTEIN perpetuated this abuse in similar ways. Victims were initially recruited to provide “massages” to EPSTEIN, which became increasingly sexual in nature and would typically include one or more sex acts. EPSTEIN paid his victims hundreds of dollars in cash for each encounter.
In particular, during encounters at the New York Residence, victims would be taken to a room where they would perform a massage on EPSTEIN, during which EPSTEIN would frequently escalate the nature and scope of physical contact with his victims to include, among other things, sex acts such as groping and direct and indirect contact with the victims’ genitals. In connection with the encounters, EPSTEIN, or one of his employees or associates, typically paid each victim hundreds of dollars in cash. Once minor victims were recruited, EPSTEIN or his employees or associates would contact victims to schedule appointments for “massages.” As a result, many victims were abused by EPSTEIN on multiple subsequent occasions."
"To further enable him to abuse underage girls, EPSTEIN asked and enticed certain of his victims to recruit additional minor girls to perform “massages” and similarly engage in sex acts with EPSTEIN. When a victim would recruit another underage girl for EPSTEIN, he paid both the victim-recruiter and the new victim hundreds of dollars in cash. Through these victim-recruiters, EPSTEIN maintained a steady supply of new victims to exploit, and gained access to dozens of additional underage girls to abuse."
So clearly, from these charges, we can see what Epstein's modus operandi and type of sexual abuse was. Notice how none of these charges involved Epstein "pimping" underage girls out to "clients", or even involved Epstein's infamous island. What the charges instead spell out is a pattern of predatory behavior in which Epstein would induce underage victims to give him massages which would gradually become more and more sexual in nature, before he would then offer the victims money in exchange for procuring more victims. It clearly shows that insofar as sex trafficking was involved, it involved the procuring and trafficking of victims TO EPSTEIN, not to any "clients".
So with that out of the way, now it should be pretty clear that the type of sex trafficking Epstein engaged in did not involve being a "pimp" or selling victims to "clients". This is crucial to understand in any discussions of Epstein's crimes insofar as sex trafficking is concerned. Sex trafficking covers a broad range of criminal acts, and to pretend that it must always involve the sale of a victim to a "client" is a total corruption of its actual definition.
The "Client List" Hoax
But what about the infamous "Epstein client list", you may ask? If Epstein didn't sell victims to anyone, then where did this client list come from?
Well, long story short, there is no client list. The so-called "Epstein client list" is nothing more than a hoax, with origins in right-wing conspiracy theorist influencer accounts on Twitter. It doesn't exist and it never has existed. It doesn't even make sense for such a "client list" to exist in the first place.
First off, let's imagine the logic - or rather the lack thereof - of an Epstein "client list" even existing. Why on earth would a sex trafficker keep a detailed list of his clients? What, did Epstein need it for a tax write-off? For posterity? It just makes no sense.
But let's just say, for the sake of argument, that such a client list exists anyway. This raises more questions. Firstly, in what form would this client list even exist? Where would it have come from? Are we really to believe that Epstein kept, say, a PDF on his computer entitled "List of wealthy elites I sold children to"?
But OK, let's again say, for the sake of argument, that the list exists in this form or something like it. Obviously the FBI would have found this client list in their searches of Epstein's properties. But how would the public even know about the existence of this list? If the so-called "Deep State" didn't (and still doesn't) want to release the list, why on earth would they hint to the public that such a list even exists? That makes no sense either. And indeed, no FBI or DOJ press release about Epstein has ever mentioned anything about the existence of a "client list" - so how did the public even become aware of such a list's existence if it is, in fact, real?
But let's say, once again for the sake of argument, that we can forgive the illogic of a sex trafficker maintaining a detailed list of clients. Let's say that Epstein decided, for one reason or another, and in defiance of common sense, to keep such a list, and that the list is in possession of the FBI. This raises another question: what value as evidence would this "client list" even hold? What good would this list of names be? Are we to believe that a list of names kept by a dead pedophile and criminal is somehow enough evidence to arrest them?
Of course not. The authorities would still have to investigate each person on this list individually. The word of a dead pedophile's supposed "client list" would not be enough evidence to make the mass sweeping arrests that the conspiracy faithful seem to think it would.
Now, some conspiracy theorists have claimed that Epstein would have kept a list of clients to use as blackmail, but even this idea makes no sense when one thinks about it. What sort of blackmail would Epstein want to use this list for? The conspiracy theorists rarely, if ever, answer this question. So what sort of "blackmail"? For money? Epstein already had a reliable means of making money legally; he became a billionaire simply by running a legitimate investment firm. That doesn't make sense either.
But let's say Epstein wanted to use this list for blackmail for some reason. How would he ensure that this "blackmail" wouldn't ultimately expose him as a sex trafficker? Say Epstein provides underage victims to a "client" for blackmail, and maybe videotapes the sexual encounter. What's to stop this "client" - upon being exposed as a pedophile or child rapist - from immediately telling authorities that Epstein supplied the victim to him, perhaps in hope of receiving leniency? With all this in mind, the "blackmail" motive for keeping such a list doesn't make sense.
Furthermore, even if Epstein knew the blackmail potential of such a list and used it for such purposes, this would only add to its unreliability as evidence.
Take this hypothetical. Imagine a billionaire - who is unaware of Epstein's involvement in child sex trafficking - is invited to Epstein's island, perhaps so Epstein can procure blackmail by inticing this billionaire to have sex with children. Once there, this billionaire is offered the chance to have sex with children but declines, robbing Epstein of the ability to procure video footage to use as blackmail. What is to stop Epstein - knowing the blackmail potential of merely being on the list - from simply putting this recalcitrant billionaire's name on the so-called "client list" to use as blackmail anyway?
Things like this would make such a "client list" - even if one actually existed - utterly useless as evidence of wrongdoing by anyone.
And all of this is still assuming that Epstein was involved in selling children to "elites", when we already know from the charges against him that that was not the sort of sex trafficking he was ever accused of.
The "Epstein client list" seems to be, at least in part, conflated with the flight logs for Epstein's private plane, which do indeed show some high profile names. However, not only do the flight logs not provide evidence of wrongdoing by anyone who flew on the plane, but the flight logs have been publicly available since 2019.
And the so-called "Lolita Express" that took people to the island, and that has been used to smear anyone who flew on Epstein's plane as a pedophile? Well, the term "Lolita Express" was actually invented around 2015 by a British tabloid discussing Epstein, and was never used by Epstein or anyone else in his circle to describe his private jet. In fact, none of Epstein's crimes - at least the ones he was charged with - are alleged to have ever taken place on Little St. James; the federal charges and allegations against Epstein clearly show that the abuse happened in Epstein's New York and Florida homes.
So there we go. There is no "Epstein client list", and it doesn't even make sense for one to exist anyway. The hype and sensationalism around this so-called "client list" is utterly meritless. It is a perfect example of misinformation-fueled mass hysteria at its absolute worst.
The problem witness: Virginia Giuffre
When I said before that no victims had ever accused Jeffrey Epstein of being a "pimp", that wasn't entirely true. In fact, a grand total of two alleged Epstein victims - out of approximately 150 - have alleged that they were sex trafficked by Epstein to clients such as Prince Andrew, Richard Branson, and Bill and Hillary Clinton.
I won't spend too much time discussing the first accuser, Sarah Ransome,
because she is not even close to being a reliable witness. Sarah Ransome once claimed to have videos of her being raped by Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Richard Branson, and Donald Trump, but in an interview with the New York Post,
Ransome later admitted she invented the story about the sex tapes to "draw attention to Epstein's behavior". She later sent an incoherent email to the Post claiming that her emails had been "hacked" by the CIA on Hillary Clinton's orders, and threatened to go to "the Russians" or WikiLeaks. Does this person sound like a reliable witness? I don't think so.
However, the main accuser is the late Virginia Giuffre, who died by suicide earlier this year following a period of declining mental health. Giuffre made headlines after she accused Epstein of trafficking her to Prince Andrew when she was underage, and she has been held up as a sort of "star witness" against Epstein and his supposed "clients".
But Giuffre is also far from a reliable witness, at least when it comes to her accusations against Prince Andrew and other celebrities in Epstein's circle. In 2019, Giuffre accused Harvard professor and prominent lawyer Alan Dershowitz of being one of the men Epstein trafficked her to. When Dershowitz denied the allegations, Giuffre sued him for defamation and doubled down on her claims. In fact, it wasn't until 2022
that Giuffre finally admitted she "may have been mistaken" in accusing Dershowitz and withdrew her lawsuit against him.
Giuffre also accused Prince Andrew of sexual misconduct at Epstein's direction, but these accusations are also dubious. In her first interview, Giuffre admitted to meeting Prince Andrew, but
denied that anything sexual occurred between them. Later, she changed her story, claiming that in 2001 she had sex with Prince Andrew at Epstein's direction. Later she changed her story again, claiming she had sex with Prince Andrew in an orgy involving nine other people.
Giuffre was even inconsistent on how old she was when she met Epstein. She alternately claimed to have met Epstein when she was 15, 16, or 17, and even once claimed to have miscarried Epstein's baby when she was 16.
Giuffre also made a series of other wildly dubious claims in addition to her accusations against Prince Andrew. She later claimed to have had sex with an unnamed "foreign president", as well as Paris Hilton's father and Jacques Cousteau's daughter - all allegations she later retracted.
Regarding Prince Andrew, a single picture does exist showing Giuffre standing next to Prince Andrew and convicted Epstein accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell.
Maxwell herself has claimed the photo is a hoax. But all this photo proves - if it is indeed authentic - is that Prince Andrew and Virginia Giuffre met at some point, and given that Epstein and Prince Andrew were acquainted, this isn't all that surprising. But this picture alone is not proof of any wrongdoing on Prince Andrew's part, and while Prince Andrew did indeed settle a lawsuit brought forth by Virginia Giuffre against him, he continues to deny her allegations and no witness - be they other victims or former employees or associates of Epstein - has ever corroborated Giuffre's sexual abuse accusation against Prince Andrew.
Indeed, so unreliable was Virginia Giuffre that she wasn't even called as a witness in the federal trial against Epstein's accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell. One would think that Giuffre - posited by many conspiracy theorists as the star witness against Epstein - would be critical in giving testimony against Epstein's co-conspirator, but her inconsistent claims, false accusations against Alan Dershowitz, and frequent changing of her story evidently made her unreliable.
Furthermore, Virginia Giuffre herself
has even been accused of helping procure victims for Epstein. According her former boyfriend Philip Guderyon, Giuffre "was like the head bitch. She’d have like nine or 10 girls she used to bring to him [Epstein]. She never looked like she was being held captive.” Crystal Figueroa, the sister of another former boyfriend, is quoted to have said: “She would say to me, ‘Do you know any girls who are kind of slutty?’”
In the years before her death,
Giuffre also began to propagate conspiracy theories involving QAnon - a cultish, far-right conspiracy theorist movement which believes that elite Democrats and celebrities run secret child sex rings in which they abuse and murder children in Satanic rituals and drink their blood to stay young. She tweeted QAnon slogans such as "#SaveTheChildren" and "#GreatAwakening", and in the leadup to an unsealing of certain documents related to Epstein, Giuffre posted a picture of a giant Q with the text "We've Awoken".
Now, does any of this sound like something a totally credible witness would say or do? Obviously, accusations of child sexual abuse should be taken seriously, but if a victim has a history of making false accusations, changing stories, endorsing blatantly false conspiracy theories about Democrats being cannibals and pedophiles, and even possibly participating in Epstein's crimes themselves - does that not at all call into question the reliability of that person's testimony?
Does this mean that Virginia Giuffre is a liar? No, not necessarily - or at least not entirely. It is known for sure that she was sexually abused and exploited by Jeffrey Epstein as a teenager. But all of this is enough to call into serious question the reliability of her testimony of Epstein being a "pimp", and especially the veracity of her accusations against Prince Andrew. And the fact remains that no other known Epstein victim has ever claimed to have been trafficked to or abused by anyone except Epstein himself.
Epstein's Death: Suicide, not Murder
When Jeffrey Epstein was found dead in his jail cell at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York City on August 10, 2019, conspiracy theories around Epstein exploded. People on both sides of the political spectrum - both liberal and conservative - became convinced that Epstein had been murdered to cover up the crimes of his many "clients". Suspicion only further deepened when it emerged that two cameras outside Epstein's cell had malfunctioned the night of his death.
After Epstein's death, the hashtags #ClintonBodyCount and #TrumpBodyCount went viral on Twitter as both left-wing and right-wing users flooded social media to accuse each side of "silencing" Epstein. The phrase "Epstein didn't kill himself" went viral and became somewhat of a "meme of the year". And the sentiment was reflected in public opinion, too. Only 16% of those polled in November, 2019, believed that Epstein had committed suicide, with 45% believing he had been murdered and the remaining 39% being unsure.
However, an autopsy ruled that Epstein's death had been a suicide, specifically a suicide by hanging, and that Epstein had hanged himself with his bedsheets sometime during the night of August 9-10. Still, Epstein's own defense attorneys and a sizeable plurality of the American public continue to disbelieve in the results of the official autopsy and have continually insisted that Epstein was murdered to prevent him from exposing powerful people who had been his "clients".
But they are wrong. Epstein did, in fact, kill himself, and he had ample reason to kill himself. We can be extremely confident of that.
Now, some conspiracy theorists will undoubtedly point to this as being evidence not of suicidal ideation, but instead a failed murder attempt - proof that the "Deep State" had tried to kill Epstein once before but had failed. But, like most conspiracy theories surrounding Epstein, this theory falls apart under even the slightest scrutiny.
Firstly, the cameras outside Epstein's cell during the first suicide attempt did not malfunction that night, and the footage doesn't show anyone entering Epstein's cell. Secondly, if this was somehow an attempt to murder Epstein by the "Deep State", how and why did they fail to kill him? How did they not only fail, but wait another EIGHTEEN DAYS before trying it again? And thirdly, if Epstein was in fact targeted for murder, why did he not tell anyone - not the guards, other inmates, or even his own defense attorneys - that someone had tried to kill him?
And if there were concerns by the supposed conspirators that Epstein would reveal his clients once in custody, why was Epstein not only allowed to be taken into custody, but allowed to remain alive for over a month - a month in which he had ample time to spill the beans on his many supposed illicit clients? It all just makes no sense.
Only two days before his death,
Epstein met with his attorneys to change his last will and testament. Specifically, Epstein changed the terms of his will to move all of his assets into a private trust. This, I believe, is the key to understanding why Epstein committed suicide; he wanted to deny his victims his estate. If Epstein was convicted of the charges against him - and that was a prospect that seemed very likely, if not certain - Epstein's victims would be able to collect damages on his estate as restitution. But if Epstein died before his trial - and moved his assets into a private trust - it would make it far more difficult for any of his victims to receive restitution.
Now some people whom I've brought this up to have scoffed at the notion that Epstein would care about what would happen to his money after his death. But it isn't, in fact, out of line with Epstein's personality. He had an unusually grotesque fascination with his posthumous legacy. He had a fixation on eugenics, and
once said to a friend that he hoped to "seed the human race" with his DNA. He
also expressed a morbid desire to have his penis frozen and hoped to be "brought back to life in the future" after he was dead. Clearly, Epstein was not only concerned with what his legacy would be after he was dead; he was in fact disturbingly obsessed with it.
Furthermore, only a few weeks before his death,
Epstein sent a letter from jail to fellow convicted child sex offender Larry Nassar, who is currently serving 235 years in prison for sexually abusing hundreds of young athletes - most of them underage girls - while he was an osteopathic physician and sports doctor for USA Gymnastics. While the content of the letter is still unknown, its very existence provides a possible additional context for Epstein's suicide.
Like Jeffrey Epstein, Larry Nassar made international headlines when his numerous sex crimes against children were uncovered. When he was brought to justice in 2018, the former physician-turned-serial child molester was forced to sit in court day after day and listen to hundreds of his victims confront and excoriate him in impact statements that were broadcast live across the world - a stark and humiliating public fall from grace for a once beloved and respected doctor. All of this couldn't have been too far off of Epstein's mind, and Epstein must have undoubtedly known that a similar fate could await him in the not-too-distant future should he make it to trial like Nassar had.
Think of it this way. If you were an ultra-wealthy sex criminal and financier who was once on top of the world, living the high life and rubbing shoulders with the rich and famous - and who had gotten away with everything for so long - would you suddenly be prepared for the very likely prospect of spending the rest of your life in federal prison? Not just in prison, but also with the added stigma of being a child sex offender? Child sex offenders are often targets for violence by other inmates behind bars, and Epstein's notoriety as one of America's most notorious child molesters undoubtedly would have made him infamous among the inmates of any prison where he would be sent to.
Epstein must have known all of this. He wasn't stupid. He had to have known that his life as he knew it was over, and that his future would be one of humiliation, torment, captivity, and living with the knowledge that he had lost everything he had worked so hard to build over his entire life. In that situation, can we really be surprised that he would take his own life rather than face the otherwise-inevitable consequences of his actions?
I think you know the answer.
But perhaps the biggest indicator that Epstein killed himself rather than being murdered is the fact that his accomplice, Ghislaine Maxwell, is still alive and has been in custody for the last five years, serving a 20-year sentence for her role in procuring victims for Epstein - not, as the conspiracy theorists often like to cynically and snidely claim, for supposedly "sex trafficking children to nobody".
If Epstein was murdered to "silence" him and protect his clients from exposure, why would the conspirators not see it fit to silence Maxwell, too? It seems like a pretty big loose end for the conspirators to leave open. Yet Maxwell, now a convicted child sex trafficker, still lives.
Again, it just makes no sense.
There is a principle known as "Occam's razor", that the simplest explanation more often than not is the correct explanation. So what is more likely: that Epstein was murdered in a clumsy, haphazard way to protect clients that he never had by conspirators who took far too many chances at being exposed, and who still left far too many loose ends open, or that Epstein - knowing that the game was up and that his life as he knew it was over - decided to kill himself to avoid the public humiliation and torment that he knew awaited him?
Once again, I think you know the answer.
"Epstein didn't kill himself" has become a viral meme, a sort of reflexive cultural expression of cynicism of "elites" and the "official story". But cynicism isn't evidence, and the evidence overwhelmingly supports the idea that Epstein's death was the result of a carefully planned and calculated suicide, not murder.
The Epstein Conspiracy: Mass Hysteria at its Worst
It's really astounding how Epstein is still such a news item so many years since his death. It's because the far-right has made obsessive conspiracy theories around Epstein, pedophilia, and child sex trafficking core components of their ideology and it has completely hijacked public discourse around child sexual abuse.
A few years ago,
I discussed the GOP's obsession with pedophilia and "grooming", especially when used to smear their opponents. For years now, through things like Pizzagate and QAnon, the American far-right has cultivated an angry mob hypercharged with conspiracy theories about secret pedophile rings, and this conspiratorial narrative and obsession with pedophilia was ultimately mainstreamed into the GOP, who ran campaigns hyperfocused on "grooming" and "protecting children" from "elite pedophiles".
Epstein and his mythical list in particular became a hyperfixation by right-wing commentators and pundits, especially in the leadup to the 2024 election.
"Folks, the Epstein client list is a big deal. Who's on the Epstein tapes, folks?", asked right-wing podcaster and now current deputy FBI director Dan Bongino. "Who's on those tapes? Who's in those black books? Why have they been hiding it?"
"Seriously, we need to release the Epstein list", echoed then-senator and now Vice President JD Vance in an October 2024 interview. "That is an important thing".
The President's son, Donald Trump Jr., even joined in on the Epstein hysteria. "I am on every list except the Epstein list!", he said at a 2024 convention hosted by the conservative activist group Turning Point USA. "How is it that my father can be convicted of 34 crimes, but no one on Epstein's list has even been brought to light? It's almost like they're trying to protect those pedophiles for some reason, I can't imagine why!"
But this is the problem when so much of your campaign and your political philosophy is based on a lie. There is no client list. There never was a client list. There was no child sex ring for elites. And now Donald Trump and his inner circle find themselves in the position of having been elected, in part, on promises they knew they could never fulfill.
Only a few months ago, Attorney General Pam Bondi was still repeating the "client list" lie on national television, telling Fox News that "[the list] is sitting on my desk right now to review", and promising it would be released soon. But it was a lie. There was no list. There never was a list. It was a promise that Bondi could never keep, and she knew it.
I can sort of understand the impulse to believe that such a list exists. Child sexual abuse is a horrible and tragically pervasive crime, and unquestionably one that for decades mainstream society failed to take seriously. Jeffrey Epstein was also a particularly heinous brand of child sex criminal, using his wealth and power to abuse children and, for decades, he build up a respectable facade to hide his crimes and evade justice.
And now, when people have been bred to believe that there is an elite cabal of pedophiles who have been abusing children for years without consequence, it's somewhat reassuring in a way to think that mass arrests of these elite pedophiles are only a single document away, and that justice is just around the corner. It's a sort of millenarian impulse that a lot of people are susceptible to.
But the problem with this kind of sensationalism around child sexual abuse is that it's based on a myth. And when conspiracy theories hijack a case involving real victims, it only hurts the people the purveyors of these theories claim to want to protect.
Child sexual abuse is a real problem that requires real solutions. Reducing it to sensationalized and fantastical conspiracy theories does far more harm than good. It glorifies the spectacle, rather than the solution, to this real and pervasive threat. It sidelines actual cases of child sexual abuse in favor of internet sleuthing and meme culture. And this growing public obsession with conspiracy theories involving pedophilia has already had dire consequences.
How many times lately have we seen people - especially on the political right - just cavalierly and callously accuse their political opponents of being pedophiles? How many times lately have we seen gay people or trans people be branded as "groomers" or "child predators"? The word "pedophile" has been misused so much in contemporary discourse that it has practically lost its meaning, basically now just a stand-in for "Anyone I don't like."
This type of attack has even been used against people who express mere skepticism over the existence of the so-called "Epstein list". Earlier this month, author Stephen King posted a tweet sarcastically reading "The Epstein client list is real. So is the Tooth Fairy and Santa Claus" - only to be flooded with thousands of angry replies smearing him as "pro-pedophile" and "defending child rape", or even claiming that King himself must be "on the list".
Is this where we are at now? Where even expressing skepticism about a conspiracy theory will get an angry mob branding you as a child molester? Where calling out lies gets you called a "pedophile"? Is this really what the discourse has come to?
Performative outrage and conspiracy theories about Epstein aren't helpful to his victims or other victims of child sexual abuse. It poisons the well. It makes it less likely for actual cases of child sexual abuse to be taken seriously. It makes it harder for real survivors to be believed and receive justice. It trivializes actual horrible crimes against children and turns it into cheap entertainment, devoid of truth or actual substance.
Worst of all, it unfairly paints the people and institutions charged with protecting victims and bringing perpetrators of sex crimes to justice as "corrupt" or otherwise untrustworthy when their investigations don't come to conclusions that validate the conspiracy theory. We have already seen this in the angry response to the DOJ debunking rumors of the "client list", despite the fact that their conclusions are completely consistent with the evidence.
The backlash from the MAGA movement over the Epstein revelation is still ongoing, as of the time of this writing. Some have said it may signal an implosion or schism within the Trumpist movement. I don't believe it will - at least not permanently. The collective cognitive dissonance of the Trump cult is difficult to break. But we are now witnessing in real time the consequences of lying to your base, cultivating a culture of outlandish conspiracy theories, and making promises based on those conspiracy theories that are impossible to deliver.
In the end, perhaps QAnon has won. They may not have gotten the mass arrests or "military tribunals" of their political enemies that they so desperately wanted, but unfortunately their paranoid worldview - that the world is secretly controlled by a secret cabal of elite pedophiles - is now depressingly mainstream, to the point that promising to hunt down a nonexistent "elite pedophile cabal" is seen as a legitimate political position and not the insane conspiratorial lunacy that it actually is.
And I also want to take time now to address the political left, which also is not blameless in feeding into the Epstein conspiracy theory delusion. In the days since the DOJ report, many Democrats and anti-Trump commentators have been repeating the claim that Trump must be on the "Epstein client list", relying on guilt-by-association tactics by showing photos of Epstein posing with Trump or Elon Musk posing with Ghislaine Maxwell as "proof" of wrongdoing.
Now, I have no love for Donald Trump or his cronies, and I admit it can be entertaining to flip the script on the people who for so long have seen fit to label all of their enemies as "pedophiles". But be warned, don't create your own mass delusion to counter another. In an age where misinformation and conspiracy theories have become frighteningly mainstream, it's more important than ever to stand up for the truth and not continue to perpetuate mass hysteria.
Remember the lesson that the Republicans are now learning the hard way: It's all fun and games until the mob you've riled up with lies turns on you.
Comments
Post a Comment